Hot News - Old, Sad U.S.

Gov. Terry McAuliffe to announce he has restored rights for 13,000 on case-by-case basis

3 14


Soooo, Governor “Muck-Muck” McAuliffe wants to try and pad the vote even more for the liberal party in the state of Virginia, huh?  It’s not enough that he, Hillary, and the party have promised “free-everything” to attract votes from every minority group in the United States, illegal aliens, and women?

And how is he doing it after Virginia’s Supreme Court reversed this attempt?  Well, by using the best Obama playbook play in the world…an illegal “executive order”!  He’s just going to defy the ruling!  Rules and laws do not apply to Hillary, Obama, and liberals in general!

I watched a press conference Muck-Muck held and his justification for his illegal action is in-line with the same old liberal whining we here in everything else…He claims that the bill written way-back-when by the Virginia congress was established to keep the black community from voting, that it was and is, racist!  So he is going to change it by himself instead of going through his elected representatives to change it, as should be done?  But to Muck-Muck, one should ask…”Hey Muck-Muck, what about all other states that do not allow convicted felons to vote?  Are their laws racist too?”

Conservative states should do the same thing when it comes to all of Obama’s executive orders/actions, particularly when it comes to illegal aliens crossing the border…defy them, even if the Supreme Court of the United States legislates from the bench!

I ask Virginians this one, simple question…So now you have a Governor who is openly defying the law of your state…what are you going to do about it?


Gov. Terry McAuliffe will announce today that he has restored the rights of more than 13,000 felons on a case-by-case basis, two sources said.

During a noon ceremony at the Virginia Civil Rights Memorial on Capitol Square, the governor also is expected to detail his rights-restoration process for other felons who have completed their terms.

In a 4-3 ruling on July 22, the Supreme Court of Virginia struck down as unconstitutional McAuliffe’s April 22 executive order that restored voting and other civil rights to about 206,000 felons who had completed their terms.

The court ordered the Virginia Department of Elections to cancel the registration of all felons who had been “invalidly registered” under McAuliffe’s actions.

The governor had promised to swiftly restore rights a second time for the roughly 13,000 ex-offenders who registered to vote under his order before the Supreme Court’s ruling. His office termed Monday’s event a “major restoration of rights announcement.”

As yet unanswered is how McAuliffe’s new actions and procedures will affect a series of complications that resulted from the rights restoration dispute.

The Virginia commissioner of elections said Friday that it’s up to Richmond officials to decide how to handle the candidacy of a felon who won and subsequently lost the right to vote and ran for office as a result of the governor’s now-overturned restoration order.

That guidance pertained only to the case of Richmond School Board candidate Kevin Starlings. He registered to vote after McAuliffe issued the blanket restoration. Starlings was certified to appear on the ballot but then lost the right to vote when the Supreme Court overturned McAuliffe’s order.

The rights restoration dispute also has ramifications for Richmond’s mayoral race. The ballot signature of a single felon who registered to vote this year, then lost his political rights in the Supreme Court’s decision, could be critical to candidate Michelle R. Mosby.

Four of Mosby’s 545 signatures to qualify for the ballot were from felons who registered under McAuliffe’s order that the Supreme Court overturned. One of those four was in Richmond’s 1st District, where Mosby obtained 50 qualified signatures, the precise number she needed for each district.

Mosby has been certified as a candidate for mayor, but state officials have not yet given local officials guidance on the issue.

Another side effect of the rights restoration dispute is that the Supreme Court’s reversal of McAuliffe’s order has left gun rights in limbo for some ex-offenders.

Restoration of civil rights is a prerequisite to apply for the restoration of firearms rights. A number of ex-offenders used their new status to apply to circuit courts to restore their gun rights and now possess firearms.

The governor’s office has blamed the complications on Republican leaders in the legislature who challenged McAuliffe’s order in court. GOP leaders say they brought the suit to hold McAuliffe accountable to the state constitution.


Related Posts


  1. Angus Rangus August 22, 2016 at 7:33 AM -  Reply


    Notice even DNC Leftie Doris Goodwin is aware:

    “” Donald Trump may or may not fix his campaign, and Hillary Clinton may or may not become the first female president. But something else happening before our eyes is almost as important: the complete collapse of American journalism as we know it. “”

    “” The largest broadcast networks — CBS, NBC and ABC — and major newspapers like The New York Times and Washington Post have jettisoned all pretense of fair play. Their fierce determination to keep Trump out of the Oval Office has no precedent. “”

    “” By torching its remaining credibility in service of Clinton, the mainstream media’s reputations will likely never recover, nor will the standards. No future producer, editor, reporter or anchor can be expected to meet a test of fairness when that standard has been trashed in such willful and blatant fashion. “”

    “” Liberal bias in journalism is often baked into the cake. The traditional ethos of comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable leads to demands that government solve every problem. Favoring big government, then, becomes routine among most journalists, especially young ones.

    I know because I was one of them. I started at the Times while the Vietnam War and civil-rights movement raged, and was full of certainty about right and wrong.””


    … without the Freedom of the Press… how many of our UNALIENABLE RIGHTS go undefended??

  2. Angus Rangus August 22, 2016 at 7:44 AM -  Reply

    May 21, 2001 Palm Beach Post headline: “over 6,000 felons voted in 2000 election”!!

    Even in “RED STATES”… Florida has a Super Majority Republican House/Senate/Governor/Cabinet… your Metro Ghettos continue voter fraud thru DNC Supervisors of Elections in over a dozen counties of our 67 who refuse to comply with state voter registration audits!!

    IF “WE” can’t enforce our own state laws…
    … how close to piddling would a DC Money Laundry “public union employee savante” ??

    Or the Pretender in Chief of the White House THUGocracy…
    … same ole Civil Rights Re-enactment Lady token chairs our Fed Elections Commission…
    … MORE commies than not in charge of FCC / FBI / NLRB / all Cabinet positions / etc!!

    So entrenched you can only eliminate “THEM” by simply eliminating every Fed GOVT Dept not clearly enshrined in our US Constitution authority!!

    WOW… we just cut 75% from our bloated $4 Trillion welfare travesty!!

    Consider the Pentagon was built to size for commanding a Military of 3.5 million — with room for ‘future growth’…
    … we be down below 1.4 million!!


  3. Old Jim August 22, 2016 at 7:54 AM -  Reply

    Wasn’t our Founders reason for inserting Second Amendment…

    … clearly spelled out in The Declaration of Independence…

    … WHEN the ‘governed’ should rise up and ‘bear Arms’ against TYRANNY??

    Congress should have commenced Impeachment proceedings against 3 ‘ladies’ on SCOTUS… 1 Pretender in Chief… and most of his commie buds in every Cabinet position??

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Who's Online

4 visitors online now
0 guests, 4 bots, 0 members


Let's Stay Connected!

If you would like to stay connected an receive email updates about new stories posted you may add your email to our mailing list below. (Email addresses are kept private.)